Nearly $1M awarded wrongful death

Nearly $1M awarded in wrongful death
Originally published April 04, 2006
By Kate Leckie
News-Post Staff

FREDERICK -- A Frederick County Circuit Court jury has awarded $935,000 to the family of a Thurmont man who died about two weeks after having his gallbladder removed at Frederick Memorial Hospital on Aug. 7, 2002.

Deliberating about eight hours following a nine-day medical malpractice trial, the jury of four men and two women found that nurse Abu Kamara and Dr. Steven Nagel violated adequate standards of care for Lester Moser. They reached their verdict about 10 p.m. Friday.

The jury only placed damages against Mr. Kamara and his employer, OMV Medical Inc., ruling that it was the nurse's failure to keep Dr. Nagel informed of the patient's worsening condition that led to Mr. Moser's fatal injuries, according to documents filed at the Frederick County Courthouse.

Mr. Kamara failed to contact Dr. Nagel about three key factors: that Mr. Moser was complaining of severe pain Aug. 9, 2002; that a tube needed for suctioning was not inserted in a timely fashion; and that the patient had vomited.

Transferred to Johns Hopkins Hospital on Aug. 21, 2002, Mr. Moser died two days later of sepsis and organ failure, court documents state.

Mr. Moser, a lifelong Frederick County resident, was 79 when he died.

Virginia Moser filed the wrongful death suit Sept. 16, 2003, about a year after her husband's death from complications arising from the elective surgery.

Citing her husband's conscious pain and suffering, funeral and burial expenses, the suit sought more than $100,000 in damages for the death of her husband of 56 years and the father of her three grown children.

The jury awarded $55,000 for past expenses related to Mr. Moser's medical care; $500,000 in noneconomic damages to his estate; $250,000 in damages to his wife; and $130,000 total in damages to his children.

Contacted Monday by telephone, Ms. Moser had little to say about the trial that ended years of legal maneuvering. "It was hard," she said.

Son Wayne Moser said the family was satisfied with the verdict.

"We're not the type to sue, but we were upset with the way my father's care at the hospital was handled," Mr. Moser said. "You put your family member in the hospital, and something horrible like this happens.

"This has been a great loss for our family," he said.

John J. Sellinger, the lawyer representing the Mosers, said the family was gratified that the jury found in their favor.

"It's been difficult emotionally for them to relive such a painful event. I never met him, but Lester Moser sounds like he was a wonderful man," said Mr. Sellinger of the Silver Spring office of Greenburg & Bederman. "They're really good people."

Mr. Moser's obituary referred to an upbringing on the family's farm and time spent in the orchard.

He also worked as a school bus driver and rural letter carrier.

Mr. Kamara and OMV Medical Inc. of Takoma Park were represented by Stephen J. Cullen of Miles & Stockbridge in Towson. A phone call seeking comment Monday was not returned.

Before the case went to trial, Dr. Kevin Hurtt, who performed Mr. Moser's surgery, and Frederick Memorial Hospital were dropped as defendants.

Judge G. Edward Dwyer Jr. presided over the civil trial.

To learn more about medical malpractice issues please see medical malpractice law.  To learn more about our medical malpractice lawyer, John Sellinger, please click on medical malpractice lawyers maryland, and read the frim bio on John Sellinger.

Doctors Reporting on Doctors

The American College of Physicians published a new report in its publication The Annals of Internal Medicine. The report was a survey of over 1,600 physicians during the period of November 2003 to June 2004 regarding whether or not they reported violations of professional codes by other physicians. Although 96% of responding physicians stated that physicians should report impaired or incompetent colleagues, only 45% of respondents who had encountered impaired or incompetent physicians actually reported them. Cardiologists were the least likely of all medical specialists to report a serious medical error of which they had direct knowledge. Family practitioners were the least likely to report an impaired or incompetent colleague (Cardiologists were second by only 0.8%). Jack Lewin, CEO of the American College of Cardiology, says that cardiologists are more likely to handle such problems within their practice groups as opposed to, presumably, reporting such instances to the appropriate authorities.

First, can we please have the names of the doctors in the 4% who do not think mistakes, incompetency and impairment should be reported?

Second, this study only gives further proof of an important argument. As convenient as it is for doctors, insurance companies and politicians to scream about the rising costs of medical malpractice litigation and plaintiffs’ lawyers, the real problem cannot be ignored. Doctors are simply not well regulated. Bad doctors continue to practice without discipline. Doctors fail to report mistakes and incompetency in their colleagues. This type of behavior is not only in direct opposition to the requirements of the Hippocratic Oath but it’s also morally reprehensible. Eric Campbell, the lead author of the study and an assistant professor at Massachusetts General Hospital's Institute for Health Policy, said that "failing to report incompetent physicians and allowing them to practice will have an impact on the welfare of patients...It's clearly something that people should be aware of."

In comparison, lawyers have an ethical duty to report such errors or incompetency in their lawyers. Failure to do can result in discipline for the non-reporting lawyer. Doctors should be held so accountable.

Other notable results from the survey:

  • a majority of responding doctors said they would refer patients to an imaging facility (e.g., for an MRI) in which they had a financial interest, but only 24% would actually tell theirpatients of that financial interest. 
  • while 93% said doctors should provide necessary medical care regardless of a patient's ability to pay, only 69% currently accept uninsured patients who are unable to pay

To learn more about medical malpractice issues, please see medical malpractice law.  To learn more about our medical malpractice lawyer, John Sellinger, please click on medical malpractice lawyer maryland, and read the firm bio.

Medical Malpractice Law Suits

In the last few days, Republican politicians have once again been arguing for reform and regulation of lawsuits. During this same period, the national news wire agencies have seen several articles detailing with medical horror stories:

Man dies of heart attack after waiting three hours in hospital waiting room complaining of chest pains

Rhode Island Hospital operates on wrong side of patient’s brain for third time THIS YEAR 

Remember that these stories are more common than one might think. The medical profession is not sufficiently regulated. Remember egregious mistakes like these the next time politicians begin waxing poetic about the tort reform.

In better news, trial lawyers are actually making legislative headway protecting the rights of the injured and unprotected. The article, however, makes it a point to mention how much money trial lawyers donate to the Democratic party and its candidates. It does not, however, mention how much money insurance companies donate to Republicans.

To learn more about medical malpractice issues, please visit medical malpractice law.  To learn more about our medical malpractice lawyer, please click on medical malpractice lawyer maryland, and read about John Sellinger.