Medical Malpractice Law Suits

In the last few days, Republican politicians have once again been arguing for reform and regulation of lawsuits. During this same period, the national news wire agencies have seen several articles detailing with medical horror stories:

Man dies of heart attack after waiting three hours in hospital waiting room complaining of chest pains

Rhode Island Hospital operates on wrong side of patient’s brain for third time THIS YEAR 

Remember that these stories are more common than one might think. The medical profession is not sufficiently regulated. Remember egregious mistakes like these the next time politicians begin waxing poetic about the tort reform.

In better news, trial lawyers are actually making legislative headway protecting the rights of the injured and unprotected. The article, however, makes it a point to mention how much money trial lawyers donate to the Democratic party and its candidates. It does not, however, mention how much money insurance companies donate to Republicans.

To learn more about medical malpractice issues, please visit medical malpractice law.  To learn more about our medical malpractice lawyer, please click on medical malpractice lawyer maryland, and read about John Sellinger.

Dangerous Toys

As the holiday season approaches, parents must make sure to review their children’s gift lists. Unlike the urban legends surrounding dangerous Halloween candy, certain toys do pose significant risks to children. This year, we've already seen multiple toy recalls.  Beyond the dangers of using lead paint in toys, detachable pieces can cause choking hazards.

Consumer groups advise that the most suspect toys are:

  • Riding toys, skateboards and inline skates that could cause dangerous falls for children.
  • Toys with small parts that can cause choking hazards, particularly for children under age 3.
  • Toys with small magnets, particularly for children under age 6, that can cause serious injury or death if the magnets are swallowed.
  • Projectile toys such as air rockets, darts and sling slots for older children that can cause eye injuries.
  • Chargers and adapters that can pose burn hazards to children.

Make sure that you check the toy’s label for information regarding possible safety hazards. In addition, make sure to use common sense. Although your loved little one may want a particular holiday item, they may simply be too young.

Besides, they’ll probably like playing with the box more anyway.

To learn more about product liability issues, please see our website at G&B Website.

Insurance Denies Claims

The LA Times is reporting that Health Net, Inc. gave bonuses to employees based on how many policies were canceled or dropped. The state of California slapped a $1 million dollar fine on the company for this practice. Technically, the fine is not for that particular conduct. The fine is for lying to investigators about the policy on two separate occasions. In addition to the fine, the insurer has agreed to discontinue the practice.

California is currently investigating the coverage policies of 4 other companies -- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc., PacifiCare Health Systems Inc., Blue Cross of California, Blue Shield of California.

This is just ANOTHER reminder that insurance companies are corporations. Corporations exist to make a profit for their shareholders. They DO NOT EXIST to help people. If so, they would be charities. Insurance companies make money by denying claims.

For a detailed review of how denying claims and/or raising premiums creates a profit see here.

To learn more about persona injury insurance issues please go to personal injury law.  To learn more about our personal injury lawyers, please click on personal injury lawyers maryland, and read the firm bios on Andrew Bederman, Roger Greenberg, or Jason Fernandez.

DC Drivers Worst

GMAC Insurance has surveyed drivers across the country to determine the quality of drivers on our nation's roads. The 2007 GMAC Insurance National Drivers Test measured the knowledge of drivers by asking questions that could have appeared on the state's driving exam. 1 out of 6 persons would have failed the test (18%). The number of failures increased from 9% in 2006.

How did the Metro area fare? DC ranked 48th out of 51. Virginia ranked 41st. Maryland "topped" the Metro area by ranking 25th.

Despite the District's poor performance, it was the only of the three jurisdictions to have a decrease in the number of auto related fatalities from 2005 to 2006. Both Virginia and Maryland reported an increase in deaths according to numbers published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

What do these numbers mean for residents of the metro area? Be careful in the car. Driving is one of the most dangerous activities (if not the most dangerous) that Americans routinely do.

To learn more about automobile personal injury issues please see our website at auto accidents.  To learn more about our accident lawyers, please click on auto accident lawyers maryland, and read our firm bios on Andrew Bederman, Roger Greenberg, or Jason Fernandez.

Contingency Fees

Personal Injury - How Law Firms are Paid

In personal injury cases, Greenberg and Bederman is paid on a contingency basis. This means that if the case is won, Greenberg & Bederman will take a percentage of the recovery as a fee, and will also recover its costs. The balance of the recovery will go to the client. Either the money will go to pay the client’s medical expenses, or will go directly to the client. If the case is lost, the client will not be responsible for legal fees, but will still be responsible for their medical bills.

Contingency billing makes it possible for people to have access to the legal system even if they do not enough money to hire a lawyer who expects to be paid whether the case is won or lost.

Many people do not like the idea of contingency billing, since they feel that it encourages frivolous law suits. There is no doubt that some law suits are filed which have no merit. They waste the court’s time and cause delay. They are brought by people who are angry at the way they have been treated, who feel that they have been insulted, who are primarily interested in revenge. The people who are sued must defend themselves, and may incur large legal expenses.

The British legal system handles such cases very differently. Under British rules, the loser in a civil suit must pay the legal expenses for both sides. This certainly discourages frivolous lawsuits. But the British pay a very high price for this rule. Bringing a lawsuit is so risky that most people cannot consider doing it, because the possible expenses in case of loss are so great. The result is that the average British citizen has no access to the legal system. In cases of personal injury, most people are at the mercy of insurance companies, since insurance companies have lawyers and the average citizen does not.

Perhaps the best example of the drawbacks of the British system is the famous case of Robert Maxwell.

Maxwell was a Russian who was born in 1923. During World War II he served in the British Army, became a commissioned officer and a British citizen, and took the name of Robert Maxwell. He became extremely wealthy, and built a huge business empire, including many newspapers. He was always a controversial figure, and there were rumors of improprieties and unethical financial dealings. He did not hesitate to sue anyone for libel who said anything about him that he did not like.

Eventually he disappeared from his yacht, and was later found floating in the ocean. Foul play was suspected, thought nothing was ever proven. But after his death his business empire collapsed. It turned out that he had been guilty of all sorts of financial misconduct, including misappropriation of funds and bank fraud. His businesses went bankrupt, there were huge losses, and many of his employees had their pensions wiped out. It was a first-class financial scandal.

Why was he able to get away with such massive misconduct? The British rules concerning lawsuits were one of the principle reasons. Many people suspected that Maxwell was guilty of misconduct, but no one dared to say anything in public. They knew that they would be sued for libel if they did. The only way that they could defend themselves under British procedure was to prove to the court’s satisfaction that what they had said about Maxwell was true. Maxwell’s businesses were so complex, and so little information about them was publicly available, that they would never be able to do this. They would inevitably lose. They would have to pay whatever judgment the court imposed, they would have to pay their own legal expenses, and in addition they would have to pay for all of Maxwell’s legal expenses as well. They had to assume that they would face total financial ruin. As a result, no one dared to say anything.

The British system certainly keeps frivolous lawsuits under control, but the price is high. Contingency billing has drawbacks, but it allows the average citizen access to the legal system in order to defend their interests.
 

To learn more about personal injury issues, please click on  personal injury law.  To learn more about our personal injury lawyers, please click on personal injury lawyers maryland, and read our firm bios on Andrew Bederman, Roger Greenerg, or Jason Fernandez.

Kayne West's Mother is a Possible Victim of Malpractice

According to the L.A. Times, an investigation has been launched into the doctor and the death of rap and music star Kayne West's mother, Donna West. The Los Angeles County coroner completed the preliminary autopsy and ruled Ms. West's death to be "as a result of surgery or anesthesia."

The doctor, Jan Adams, is not a stranger to complaints. Earlier this year, he was served with a complaint seeking to revoke or susend his license to practice medicine due to three convictions for alcohol-related offenses. Dr. Adams paid out $467,337 in settlements for medical malpractice claims in 2001. In 2005, Dr. Adams was sued for medical malpractice and sexual battery by a patient. That complaint alleged that Dr. Adams had sex with an incapcitated patient. That case was settled out of court with a confidentiality agreement.

 To learn more about medical malpractice issues, please see medical malpractice.  To learn more about our medical malpractice lawyer, John Sellinger, please click on maryland medical malpractice lawyer, and read our firm bio.

Medical Malpractice Insurance Premiums

As the 2008 election cycle nears, the American public will undoubtedly begin hearing about the legal boogeyman – frivolous medical malpractice lawsuits. Texas Republicans famously (and deceitfully) distributed a press release in 2002 that claimed that 86% of all medical malpractice claims were frivolous. President Bush has declared the need for tort reform regarding medical malpractice claims in his State of the Union address. There is no reason to believe that in the current political climate, candidates will not again try to score points with voters by trumpeting reforms of the tort system. But, should voters listen to that tired old song?

The argument goes that frivolous lawsuits are increasing medical malpractice insurance premiums, which in turn makes the practice of medicine prohibitively high. This argument has two main parts: (1) that there are a lot of frivolous lawsuits; (2) increased pay-outs for claims (by settlement or court judgment) increase insurance premiums. Research has shown that both of these claims are false.

Continue Reading...