Understanding The New Pit Bull Law In Maryland
About two weeks ago we wrote a story on Maryland’s new law regarding pit bull bites, and some folks have been a little confused by the judge’s ruling on the matter. In the interest of clarifying what this new law means, we thought we would try to expand our explanation a bit.
The ruling in question happened in a case called Tracy v Solesky. The case involved a pit bull owner who had failed to properly secure the animal. The dog escaped and mauled a child. The child’s parents sued for damages. Since the owner of the pit bull was a tenant, the family of the victim sued the landlord on the grounds that he allowed the tenant to have the dangerous dog in the first place.
Here is the ruling of the judge, and this is absolutely verbatim:
“…When an attack involves pit bulls, it is no longer necessary to prove that
the particular pit bull or pit bulls are dangerous.”
Continue Reading...